While all the information in here may be available elsewhere (namely, by asking PUI or by perusing their website or archives), it has been sorted, cleaned up and organized by our team. Please read our FAQ first, however, before sending us any correspondence.
If you believe you have found one, we certainly would be happy to have it brought to our attention so that we can verify it and correct it, if needed. Note, however, although we try to be accurate, we are not responsible for any inaccuracies that may have crept into the work. This editing ensures the copyright of this work and will also help us to verify any uncredited, "stolen" versions of the Rulings Compendium that might surface out there as unauthorized copies of our work. In some cases, we have added wording for clarity. The vast majority of these rulings are literal "copy-and-paste" from the chat transcripts themselves, although we have taken the liberty of cleaning up spelling, grammar and punctuation (which are often less than optimal in real-time chats) and we have edited for clarity. If you have doubts as to the accuracy of the Compendium, we have provided the source for each and every one of these rulings, so that you may verify them if you wish. You can't get any better praise than that! Will PUI endorse the Compendium as a ruling source for Players, League Leaders, TOs and Judges, just as WotC has done in the past?Ī. Q.So unless something changes the way a card works, those rules should be OK well, we're allowed to have whatever work they produced for Pokémon. Anything that was done for Pokémon, goes to PUI or. What is the status of rulings that were made while WotC was in control of the property?Ī. There may not be an official Judge Accreditation procedure, but there are a surprisingly large amount of rulings and errata that a Judge should be aware of!įirst off, in case you are wondering about the "status" of using the older WotC rulings: Q. This compilation was designed to facilitate rulings at Pokémon tournaments. Only official sources are located here, which, so far, includes the online documents published via the Pokémon TCG website ( ) and also the Pokémon Rules Team Discussions. On January 4, the YouTuber tweeted that he’s flying to Chicago to verify its authenticity with the BBCE.The Compendium is a compilation of Official Rulings on the Pokémon Trading Card Game as presented by Pokémon USA, Incorporated (PUI). While it’s not been confirmed that Logan Paul’s $3.5 million dollar collectible is fake, many collectors in the hobby are now questioning its legitimacy. Renowned collector Gary ‘King Pokemon’ Haase who also owns a sealed 1st Edition Base Set Box had to use this method to get his item authenticated. Read More: 22 most expensive & rarest Pokemon cards ever soldĪccording to PokeBeach the only way to truly verify the collectible is to peek inside the box.Primarily, the expensive Base Set product was authenticated by a smaller company with little experience in Pokemon cards and with a lack of information usually present in hot ticket items of this value. The TCG outlet also raised concerns about the box’s authentication. Logan Paul's $3.5 Million 'Base Set' Case May Be Fake: Pokemon Community Uncovers Significant Evidence The text on Paul’s box has no period at the end of the sentence and “Seal” isn’t capitalized like on authentic boxes,” they wrote. Finally, the outlet argues that the tape that Wizards of the Coast used in the 90s is different on Logan Paul’s item.
POKEMON TRADING CARD GAME ONLINE AUTHORIZATION FAILURE CODE
The story then points out that the barcode on the YouTuber’s 1st Edition collectible doesn’t actually match and instead lines up with the 6033 code without the 1E on the end. However, there are no known examples of a 1st edition Base Set case having “1E” in its product code.” “Paul’s case has a label with the code “WOC060331E,” which should stand for “1st Edition. “All known cases of Base Set that have sold over the years have been seen with the product code “WOC06033,” whether they were 1st edition or not,” PokeBeach explained. Read More: Logan Paul gifts fans $11k 1st Edition Base Set Pokemon card packsĪccording to the site, Paul’s Pokemon card box is unusually numbered.The publication then broke down the history of the item in online auctions such as eBay as well as the evidence that has collectors believing it to be fake. “Logan Paul’s $3.5 Million ‘Base Set’ Case May Be Fake: Pokemon Community Uncovers Significant Evidence,” the outlet tweeted. Questions of the box’s authenticity were first raised on Decemin a story published by popular Pokemon TCG site PokeBeach. Logan Paul paid $3.5 million for fake Pokemon card box? Twitter: Logan Paul The YouTuber posted a video of him paying $3.5 million for the Pokemon card box.
0 kommentar(er)
